- From: Daisuke MIYAMOTO <daisu-mi@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:03:00 +0900
- To: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57065A84.1070301@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Thanks Chaals, >> I'm working on phishing prevention, and am concerned with >> accessibility for people with disabilities. I'm afraid but >> many security information, e.g., address bar colored green, >> is really important for distinguishing legitimate sites, but >> individuals with visual impairment are hard to recognize it. (snip) > Normal browser security indicators in toolbars are only sometimes > available to screenreaders. > > But browsers often put up a warning page when a user tries to navigate > to something marked as malware by a browser, and that page is generally > "reasonably" accessible to screen reader users. Yes it is right when a browser succeeded to identify malicious entities. I'm afraid but some phishing sites will be shown to users even they use the latest version of browser and security software. > I think the common problems are: > > 1. email-based attacks, as you note. I believe some webmail services > provide some protection from attachments, but I am not sure if dedicated > email clients do the same. > > 2. Normal websites, that ask for sensitive information such as passwords > which can be used to spend real money, on pages that are not secure. In > many cases screen reader users don't *know* whether the page is secured. > > As well as providing shortcuts to security information - which can be > done in browsers today - having the ability to state the security state > in the title of the page, so it cannot be faked by the page itself, > would be a simple technique for browsers to implement. Yes. The shortcut for accessing security information is usually appeared as visual elements. I think, keyboard shortcut will be of benefit for people with visual impairment. Kind regards, Daisuke
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 13:03:32 UTC