W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2016

Re: Screen Reader Survey for User Research Class

From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 18:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: Anh Hua <anhhua@uw.edu>
cc: accessys@smart.net, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1605171758460.14076@server2.shellworld.net>
One more point then.
Your institution has  Human centered design in its name.    may I suggest 
that you treat 
this subject if you can of course, with the individual human respect that 
title mandates.
Just as DNA sets individuals apart in unique but human ways, the factors 
behind the  choices of adaptive tools may be governed by human individual 
choices.  Choices that regardless of a shared label, may be as different 
as DNA.
Off my soapbox smiles.
Karen


On Tue, 17 May 2016, Anh Hua wrote:

> I'm also taking notes of all of the opinions! Thank you for taking the time
> to give feedback!
>
> Best wishes!
>
> *ANH HUA*
> College of Engineering
> University of Washington | Class of 2017
> Human Centered Design and Engineering
> anhhua@uw.edu
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Anh Hua <anhhua@uw.edu> wrote:
>
>> I'm terribly sorry to hear that it wasn't accessible for you. I'm a
>> student and am just starting to learn about accessibility, therefore I
>> don't entirely have the hang of it yet. I consulted a few people who use
>> screen readers to see which survey tool was accessible to use before
>> starting the project. At the end I went with Google Form because it allowed
>> anyone to access, as opposed to Catalyst, a survey tool my school provide.
>> However it seems like it is not accessible for everyone.
>>
>> So I have a few questions regarding the feedback:
>>
>>    1. Can you tell me what was inaccessible about it so I can make sure
>>    it doesn't happen again?
>>    2. What survey tools do you usually use that are accessible?
>>    3. For the problems you encountered, have that happened with Google
>>    Form before?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> *ANH HUA*
>> College of Engineering
>> University of Washington | Class of 2017
>> Human Centered Design and Engineering
>> anhhua@uw.edu
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:54 AM, <accessys@smart.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> agree with all you have said and I probably would have said similar if I
>>> wasn't so dang PO'd after my first attempt. then got busy with work.
>>>
>>> let me just add
>>>
>>> Amen!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>> On Tue, 17 May 2016, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:51:02 -0400 (EDT)
>>>> From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
>>>> To: accessys@smart.net
>>>> Cc: Anh Hua <anhhua@uw.edu>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Screen Reader Survey for User Research Class
>>>> Resent-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:51:34 +0000
>>>> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...Actually rather a few issues here.
>>>> If this survey is to have choices, it is not constructed towards that
>>>> end. instead at least for me, the entire survey is one long text entry
>>>> field. Was that intended?
>>>> Further, your questions suggest that the tool, somehow changes the
>>>> object on which that tool is used, rather than individual choices and goals
>>>> influencing how a tool is used. Some screen readers do just that read,
>>>> think of our monitor, some allow a person to interact, some work better in
>>>> different computer environments.
>>>> Additionally many populations besides those experiencing vision issues
>>>> can and often do make use of screen readers.
>>>> I have read more than once that  the human brain processes faster with
>>>> verbal input, so  that can translate to a person with another reading
>>>> uniqueness benefiting as well.
>>>> lastly since screen readers can be used in combination with other
>>>> technology, you may be missing some applications of your research.
>>>> Speaking only for myself the stereotypes associated with adaptive
>>>> technology do a great deal of damage.  Your questions seem rooted in more
>>>> stereotypes as I read it, suggesting that only one population should enjoy
>>>> inclusive web experiences.  that has me wondering what your survey will
>>>> contribute to the inclusiveness field?
>>>> Karen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2016, accessys@smart.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> survey doesn't work with all screen readers
>>>>>
>>>>> nothing like a survey about screen readers that won't work with
>>>>> them......
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Anh Hua wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 19:56:50 -0700
>>>>>>  From: Anh Hua <anhhua@uw.edu>
>>>>>>  To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>>>>>>  Subject: Screen Reader Survey for User Research Class
>>>>>>  Resent-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 02:57:24 +0000
>>>>>>  Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  My name is Anh Hua. I am a student at the University of Washington
>>>>>>  studying
>>>>>>  Human Centered Design and Engineering. This quarter I'm taking a
>>>>>> class in
>>>>>>  user research. I'm really interested in accessibility, therefore I am
>>>>>>  learning about web accessibility and screen reader usage. I would
>>>>>> really
>>>>>>  appreciate it if you can help me with this survey. The survey is only
>>>>>> 5
>>>>>>  minute long, and it would help solidify my findings from previous
>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>  as well as provide insights for my final reports.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  The link to the survey is listed below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Link to Survey <http://goo.gl/forms/M7fUC8HKpg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Thank you all! I would also really appreciate it if you have friends
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>  acquaintances who use screen readers and would have great insights to
>>>>>> add.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *ANH HUA*
>>>>>>  College of Engineering
>>>>>>  University of Washington | Class of 2017
>>>>>>  Human Centered Design and Engineering
>>>>>>  anhhua@uw.edu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 22:04:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 May 2016 22:04:42 UTC