Re[4]: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

------ Original Message ------
From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
[...]
>My concern about date-stamping failures is that failures are not 
>normative and we already have plenty of confusion about that.  [...]
>
>
>
>I agree. Anything which tends to reinforce a perception that 
>techniques/failures are normative is problematic, in my view.
>
Agreed, but we do get lost in our own jargon. Most devs don't consider 
normative/non-normative at all - and do consider anything
we publish as 'best practice' - which is questionable.

Thanks

Josh

>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or 
>confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for 
>whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received 
>this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, 
>distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this 
>information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this 
>e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>Thank you for your compliance.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------