W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2016

Re: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures

From: Gregg Vanderheiden RTF <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 14:49:02 -0500
Cc: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, "wuyinghua@ritt.cn" <wuyinghua@ritt.cn>, Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>, Wayne Dick <waynedick@knowbility.org>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A9800685-BDA4-402E-97AE-95DE1D2D23F1@raisingthefloor.org>
To: Jason J White <jjwhite@ets.org>
+1 

(Failures are non-normative too) 

gregg

> On May 9, 2016, at 1:44 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Techniques are all non-normative. Thus, it's a matter for the content author to decide which techniques to consult when writing or revising Web pages that conform to WCAG.
> 
> Of course, it's in their interests to review the most recent techniques document available, but they can still conform without consulting any techniques documents at all. If they consult an old document, apply its techniques, and thereby conform to WCAG, they're still conforming.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 19:49:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 9 May 2016 19:49:33 UTC