- From: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:25:16 -0600
- To: "'Macintosh, Kristy \(OMAFRA\)'" <Kristy.Macintosh@ontario.ca>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello, I would recommend HTML as the basis for your accessibility efforts. We will not know what kind of device is used for the reading and HTML will reflow to fit the screen size used by the student. Best George -----Original Message----- From: Macintosh, Kristy (OMAFRA) [mailto:Kristy.Macintosh@ontario.ca] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 6:25 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML Hi, I am looking for some advice and information. We have eLearning course transcripts that we are working on making fully accessible (conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines). The transcripts range in size from 30 -60 pages, have some graphics throughout, a lot of headings and lists, and multiple choice assessment items. Questions: 1. What would be a better format for these transcripts? PDF or HTML and why? 2. If HTML was the path we went - can we just save Word documents as HTML files or do we need to do HTML coding in an HTML template? a. If saving to HTML in Word is a bad idea - why? Thanks, ~Kristy Kristy Macintosh Education Coordinator - Training, Education and Communications |Environmental Management Branch | Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 1 Stone Rd West, 3rd Floor SW, Guelph, Ontario N1G 4Y2 Office: 519-826-6373 | Cell: 226-821-5359 | Fax: 519-826-3259 Email: kristy.macintosh@ontario.ca<mailto:kristy.macintosh@ontario.ca>
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2016 14:25:51 UTC