Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

That would work for me...

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden RTF <
gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote:

>
>
> On May 1, 2016, at 6:46 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>
> Dates on techniques don’t concern me as much as dates on “failures” would
> do. The latter can be misinterpreted as implying that a given practice
> wasn’t a failure before a certain date but became a failure thereafter,
> whereas we’ve established in this discussion that if a documented practice
> constitutes a failure to conform to WCAG 2.0, then it always was and always
> will be a failure to conform to WCAG 2.0.
>
>
>
> Agree.
>
> would using “Last Reviewed Date”  get around your concern?
>
> that would make it clear it was related to reviewing rather than dates
> that things apply.
>