W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2016

RE: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 20:21:45 +0000
To: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY2PR0701MB19906B91D6EE18D17FE04571AB700@BY2PR0701MB1990.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:sailesh.panchang@deque.com]


>This point had been made more than once  in the long thread, "Let's
>add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques   ". Yet the
>subject and the first email referred in this thread still seems to suggest
>documenting date against every technique is important. My point is merely
>that date of the doc is good enough for anyone wanting to reference a date
>for any reason.

I agree with you.

The same holds for the proposal of a "last reviewed date". The last reviewed date should always be the date on which the entire document is approved for publication; otherwise, the reviewers within the working group aren't doing their work properly prior to, or during, the call for consensus period.

Having a different date doesn't make sense to me.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 20:39:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 9 May 2016 20:39:16 UTC