W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2016

RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:28:25 +0000
To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Gregg Vanderheiden RTF <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
CC: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY2PR0701MB1990F3B91B26EA055BEDA746AB790@BY2PR0701MB1990.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>


From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 7:25 AM

That would work for me...

I wouldn’t object to it, although I think all of the techniques in a document should be reviewed in the weeks prior to publishing it as a W3C note.

Of course, if a database model were to be adopted then the “last reviewed date” idea makes much more sense. The underlying concept is that techniques would be reviewed via a database – similar to a bug tracking system – and, once approved, they would automatically be included in the next published “snapshot”.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 13:29:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 13:29:02 UTC