public-html@w3.org from June 2010 by date

Wednesday, 30 June 2010

• [Bug 8379] Remove Section 4.11.1 The Details Element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-93 details Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

• RE: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Paul Cotton
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Adam Barth
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Julian Reschke
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Adam Barth
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Adam Barth
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Julian Reschke
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Philip Taylor
• Processing of &prod_id= in attributes Adam Barth
• Re: ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Conformance requirements related to differences that must not matter Julian Reschke
• [Bug 10026] Scope attribute for TD bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Conformance requirements related to differences that must not matter Ian Hickson
• Conformance requirements related to differences that must not matter L. David Baron
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Karl Dubost

Sunday, 27 June 2010

• [Bug 9657] Content model of object bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Kornel Lesinski
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML4 Diffs - Object, again L. David Baron
• HTML4 Diffs - Object, again Leif Halvard Silli

Saturday, 26 June 2010

• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Joe D Williams
• IETF 78 meeting in Maastricht Julian Reschke
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Laura Carlson

Friday, 25 June 2010

• [Bug 10017] longdesc and @aria-describedby (ARIA) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10016] longdesc and @role (ARIA) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10015] longdesc URL checking bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Doug Schepers
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications L. David Baron
• ACTION-182 and Issue-27 Paul Cotton
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Chris Double
• RE: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Doug Schepers
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Doug Schepers
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Steven Faulkner
• Re: on<event> attributes as global attributes Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: on<event> attributes as global attributes Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Steven Faulkner
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Chris Double
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Steven Faulkner

Thursday, 24 June 2010

• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Aryeh Gregor
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: on<event> attributes as global attributes Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Leif Halvard Silli
• on<event> attributes as global attributes Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Lachln Hunt
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Henri Sivonen
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example Change Proposal to replace <object> fallback example Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example Change Proposal to replace <object> fallback example Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-80 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-31 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Hickson
• Fwd: Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Philip Taylor
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Hickson
• Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-80 Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-31 Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 23 June 2010

• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Ian Hickson
• Re: <figure> bugs in Differences document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: <figure> bugs in Differences document Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-30: longdesc - Straw Poll for Objections Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Leif Halvard Silli
• ISSUE-74 canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-32 table-summary - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example Change Proposal to replace <object> fallback example Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-85 anchor-roles partial Change Proposal Steven Faulkner
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Henri Sivonen
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Sam Ruby
• Re: Issue 100 Zero-Edits Counter Proposal Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-85 anchor-roles partial Change Proposal Sam Ruby
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-56 Sam Ruby
• Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-80 Sam Ruby
• Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-31 Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Toby Inkster
• Re: <figure> bugs in Differences document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Steven Faulkner
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Steven Faulkner
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Ian Hickson
• Re: <figure> bugs in Differences document Anne van Kesteren
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 22 June 2010

• Re: How to parse </foo </bar> Adam Barth
• Re: Insertion point for script@onload Adam Barth
• How to parse </foo </bar> Adam Barth
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby
• Re: Insertion point for script@onload Adam Barth
• Re: HTML5 Profiles - First Editors Draft Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Insertion point for script@onload Henri Sivonen
• Bug 9241 (was Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications) Laura Carlson
• Insertion point for script@onload Adam Barth
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Steven Faulkner
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Julian Reschke
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Hickson
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Jonas Sicking
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Julian Reschke
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Daniel Glazman

Monday, 21 June 2010

• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications L. David Baron
• Polyglot Guidance for HTML5 Foreign Content Exceptions Tony Ross
• RE: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Adrian Bateman
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Laura Carlson
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Laura Carlson

Sunday, 20 June 2010

• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Laura Carlson
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Matthew Ratzloff
• RE: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Doug Schepers

Friday, 18 June 2010

• Re: some conformance questions Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Laura Carlson
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Laura Carlson
• Re: some conformance questions Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Hickson
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: some conformance questions Henri Sivonen
• Re: table layout conformance (was: some conformance questions) Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: some conformance questions Daniel Glazman
• Re: some conformance questions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Daniel Glazman
• Re: table layout conformance Daniel Glazman
• Re: some conformance questions Daniel Glazman
• RE: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: some conformance questions Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Aryeh Gregor
• Re: some conformance questions Aryeh Gregor

Thursday, 17 June 2010

• Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Karl Dubost
• Re: table layout conformance (was: some conformance questions) Ian Hickson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Joe D Williams
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Eliot Graff
• RE: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Eliot Graff
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Joe D Williams
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 T.V Raman
• Re: table layout conformance Daniel Glazman
• Re: table layout conformance (was: some conformance questions) Steven Faulkner
• Re: table layout conformance (was: some conformance questions) Edward O'Connor
• table layout conformance (was: some conformance questions) Daniel Glazman
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• [Bug 9872] trigger a conformance error when javascript is included in href attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9871] provide normative advice to conformance checkers about use of onevent handler attributes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: some conformance questions Daniel Glazman
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: some conformance questions Daniel Glazman
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: some conformance questions Daniel Glazman
• Re: some conformance questions Daniel Glazman
• Re: some conformance questions Lachlan Hunt
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: some conformance questions Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Julian Reschke
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Simon Pieters
• Re: some conformance questions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: some conformance questions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: some conformance questions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: some conformance questions James Graham
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• some conformance questions Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 16 June 2010

• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Sam Ruby
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Richard Schwerdtfeger
• RE: HTML WG F2F meeting, Nov 4-5 at TPAC 2010, Lyon, France Paul Cotton
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Aryeh Gregor
• [Bug 9936] onclick attributes on any element that is not focusable should trigger a conformance error bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-74 Canvas-Accessibility Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Smylers
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Smylers
• Objectionism (Was: Change proposal for ISSUE-85) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-56 Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• ISSUE-105 (was Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy) Adam Barth
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Steven Faulkner
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Ian Hickson
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Adam Barth
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-56 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Julian Reschke
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Adam Barth
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-56 Adam Barth
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Henri Sivonen
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-56 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Jonas Sicking
• Change proposal for ISSUE-56 Adam Barth
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Karl Dubost
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Sam Ruby
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 15 June 2010

• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Adam Barth
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Ian Hickson
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Ian Hickson
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Sam Ruby
• Re: ruby /ruby Joe D Williams
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Henri Sivonen
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Lachlan Hunt
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Jirka Kosek
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Jirka Kosek
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Julian Reschke
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Laura Carlson
• RE: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy John Foliot
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Sam Ruby
• Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-109 aria-section-title - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-109 aria-section-title - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• CfC: Adopt ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example Change Proposal to replace <object> fallback example Sam Ruby
• CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Sam Ruby
• CfC: Adopt ISSUE-101 us-ascii-ref Change Proposal to replace ASCII reference Sam Ruby
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Jirka Kosek
• Re: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-74 Canvas-Accessibility James Graham
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Adam Barth
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Sam Ruby
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Adam Barth

Monday, 14 June 2010

• Re: text/sandboxed-html Adam Barth
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Joe D Williams
• RE: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-74 Canvas-Accessibility Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-74 Canvas-Accessibility Paul Cotton
• HTML-A11Y Task Force Recommendation: ISSUE-74 Canvas-Accessibility Janina Sajka
• Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Jonas Sicking
• Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Julian Reschke
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Adam Barth
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 13 June 2010

• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Adam Barth
• Re: ruby /ruby Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ruby /ruby Joe D Williams

Saturday, 12 June 2010

• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request for editing guidance Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Denis Boudreau
• Re: Request for editing guidance Karl Dubost
• Re: Request for editing guidance Laura Carlson
• Re: Canvas drawImage question Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for editing guidance Leif Halvard Silli
• Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Sam Ruby

Friday, 11 June 2010

• Re: Canvas drawImage question Philip Taylor
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Steven Roussey
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Simpson, Grant Leyton
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Patrick Ion
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Simpson, Grant Leyton
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Canvas drawImage question Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Canvas drawImage question Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Canvas drawImage question James Graham
• Re: Canvas drawImage question Simon Pieters
• Re: Canvas drawImage question Maciej Stachowiak
• Canvas drawImage question Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] ISSUE-86, Re: hixie: Remove the HTML-to-Atom mapping definition from the W3C version of the spec. (whatwg r5100) Julian Reschke
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Simpson, Grant Leyton
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for editing guidance Laura Carlson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for editing guidance Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for editing guidance Tantek Çelik
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Adam Barth
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Adam Barth

Thursday, 10 June 2010

• Re: text/sandboxed-html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for editing guidance Edward O'Connor
• Re: Request for editing guidance Laura Carlson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Sam Ruby
• Re: Request for editing guidance Tantek Çelik
• Re: Request for editing guidance Sam Ruby
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Robert O'Callahan
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Adam Barth
• Re: Request for editing guidance Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Aryeh Gregor
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for editing guidance Jonas Sicking
• {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2010-06-10: action items, decision policy, task force reports, publication status Adrian Bateman
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Shelley Powers
• Re: Request for editing guidance Sam Ruby
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Sam Ruby
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Daniel Glazman
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec Steven Faulkner
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Daniel Glazman
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Julian Reschke
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Daniel Glazman
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Julian Reschke
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Daniel Glazman
• RE: Request for editing guidance John Foliot
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Leif Halvard Silli
• FW: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-06-10: action items, decision policy, task force reports, publication status Paul Cotton
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Nathan
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document David Booth

Wednesday, 9 June 2010

• Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Karl Dubost
• IETF BoF @IETF-78 Maastricht: HASMAT - HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport =JeffH
• Re: Request for editing guidance Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Sam Ruby
• Re: Request for editing guidance Shelley Powers
• Re: Request for editing guidance Ian Hickson
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Request for editing guidance Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Request for editing guidance Sam Ruby
• Re: Request for editing guidance Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for editing guidance Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request for editing guidance Laura Carlson
• RE: Request for editing guidance John Foliot
• Re: Request for editing guidance Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for editing guidance Jonas Sicking
• Re: Request for editing guidance Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for editing guidance Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Request for editing guidance Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Request for editing guidance Martin Kliehm
• OFF TOPIC: SVG Progress Contest Doug Schepers
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Henri Sivonen
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Paul Libbrecht
• Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for editing guidance Laura Carlson
• Re: Request for editing guidance Laura Carlson
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document James Graham
• Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document James Graham
• Re: Request for editing guidance Charles McCathieNevile
• Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document Tim Berners-Lee
• <figure> bugs in Differences document Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request for editing guidance Jirka Kosek
• RE: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Last Call Working Drafts transition announcement of the API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 Thierry MICHEL
• Re: preparing WG publication Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Roy T. Fielding
• Request for editing guidance Ian Hickson
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Shelley Powers
• Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 8 June 2010

• Re: provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec Steven Faulkner
• RE: preparing WG publication Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec Ian Hickson
• Re: preparing WG publication Laura Carlson
• Re: preparing WG publication Anne van Kesteren
• RE: preparing WG publication Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: preparing WG publication Edward O'Connor
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: preparing WG publication John Foliot
• RE: preparing WD publication Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: preparing WG publication Simpson, Grant Leyton
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• RE: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: aside and figure elements Dean Leigh
• Re: preparing WG publication Laura Carlson
• Re: preparing WD publication Anne van Kesteren
• Re: preparing WG publication Steven Faulkner
• provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec Steven Faulkner
• RE: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• preparing WD publication Julian Reschke
• Re: preparing WG publication Anne van Kesteren
• Re: preparing WG publication Steven Faulkner
• RE: aside and figure elements Dean Leigh
• Re: preparing WG publication Anne van Kesteren
• preparing WG publication Julian Reschke
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• HTML5, Forms issue Lukas Tencer
• [Bug 9876] Clarify that a figure can be any content with a caption bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• RE: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: use of figure/figcaption Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: use of figure/figcaption Steven Faulkner
• Re: use of figure/figcaption Laura Carlson
• RE: aside and figure elements Dean Leigh
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: use of figure/figcaption James Graham
• Re: use of figure/figcaption Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• use of figure/figcaption Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements James Graham
• Re: aside and figure elements Karl Dubost

Monday, 7 June 2010

• Re: aside and figure elements Ian Hickson
• Re: aside and figure elements Dean Leigh
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Bruce Lawson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• [Bug 9872] trigger a conformance error when javascript is included in href attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner

Sunday, 6 June 2010

• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Sam Ruby
• Re: aside and figure elements Shelley Powers
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Steven Faulkner
• Re: aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-103 Julian Reschke
• Change proposal for ISSUE-85 Ian Hickson
• Change proposal for ISSUE-103 Ian Hickson

Saturday, 5 June 2010

• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• aside and figure elements Laura Carlson
• Re: [whatwg] ISSUE-86, Re: hixie: Remove the HTML-to-Atom mapping definition from the W3C version of the spec. (whatwg r5100) Julian Reschke
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot

Friday, 4 June 2010

• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Laura Carlson
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Laura Carlson
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element John Foliot
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Laura Carlson
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Adam Barth
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Adam Barth
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics Laura Carlson
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Smylers
• [Bug 9835] Remove image analysis bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Julian Reschke
• RE: text/sandboxed-html Leonard Rosenthol

Thursday, 3 June 2010

• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Robert O'Callahan
• [css2.1] handling of U+0000 - match html5? Zack Weinberg
• Re: Change proposals and objections: Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Steven Faulkner
• Re: Change proposals and objections: (was: Working Group Decision) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Julian Reschke
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• Re: ISSUE-115 (rel-canonical-human): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-114 (rel-canonical-organization): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-112 (meta-keywords-not): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-113 (forced-fragment): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-111 (checkbox-required): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• [minutes] HTML WG 20100603 Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• [Bug 9775] "positioned to a multiple of the line dimensions of the first line of the cue" - enforcing the same line height for every line ihurts text rendering appearance for no apparent reason. This is especially true if text styling is supported (bold text is larg bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9774] "consecutive lines displayed below each other" - since subtitles tend to be rendered at the bottom, it's actually better for new subtitles to be rendered higher up. Of course, the individual lines of each subtitle still extend downwards, but it's still po bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9773] There is not a clear difference between "subtitles" and "captions". These are mostly used to describe "closed captions" (binary transmissions in TV broadcasts) vs "subtitles" (text files), as far as I know. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: text/sandboxed-html Artur Adib
• [Bug 9817] Details element Focus problem bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Laura Carlson
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Steven Faulkner
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby

Wednesday, 2 June 2010

• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• [Bug 9835] Remove image analysis bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby
• Re: WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Anne van Kesteren
• WG Decision: Publish six heartbeat drafts, as well as Polyglot, Alt Techniques as FPWDs Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Change proposals and objections: (was: Working Group Decision) Sam Ruby
• Reminder: Seeking comments on LCWDs of Server-events, Web Storage, Web Workers; deadline 30-June-2010 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Larry Masinter
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Tab Atkins Jr.
• ISSUE-86, Re: hixie: Remove the HTML-to-Atom mapping definition from the W3C version of the spec. (whatwg r5100) Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-86 Change Proposal to remove Atom conversion Ian Hickson
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-90: Removing the figure Element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers

Tuesday, 1 June 2010

• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics John Foliot
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
• Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics Sam Ruby
• RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics John Foliot
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Sam Ruby
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-90: Removing the figure Element Sam Ruby
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-86 Change Proposal to remove Atom conversion Sam Ruby

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2010 22:19:30 UTC