- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:04:23 -0700
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
2010/6/13 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>: > Adam Barth, Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:18 -0700: >> 2010/6/12 Leif Halvard Silli : >>> Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC): >>> […] >>>> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the >>>> only way to have a specification that actually makes >>>> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making. >>> […] >>> >>> Thanks for relaying to us that >>> >>> (1) you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and >>> (2) that its existence isn't related to "a much better license". >> >> I don't think either of those conclusions follow from what Ian wrote. > > Regarding (1), then he underlined the opposite possibility as well: > > ]] -- I've no idea what we'll do if you make a decision on an issue of > normative relevance, like many of the issues that you keep pushing back > and not resolving. [[ You seem to be making a lot of assumptions based on very little data. I'm not sure Ian is empowered to make the W3C copy cease to exist. Adam
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 02:05:15 UTC