Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

2010/6/13 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>:
> Adam Barth, Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:18 -0700:
>> 2010/6/12 Leif Halvard Silli :
>>> Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC):
>>>  […]
>>>> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the
>>>> only way to have a specification that actually makes
>>>> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making.
>>>  […]
>>>
>>> Thanks for relaying to us that
>>>
>>> (1)  you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and
>>> (2)  that its existence isn't related to "a much better license".
>>
>> I don't think either of those conclusions follow from what Ian wrote.
>
> Regarding (1), then he underlined the opposite possibility as well:
>
> ]] -- I've no idea what we'll do if you make a decision on an issue of
> normative relevance, like many of the issues that you keep pushing back
> and not resolving. [[

You seem to be making a lot of assumptions based on very little data.
I'm not sure Ian is empowered to make the W3C copy cease to exist.

Adam

Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 02:05:15 UTC