Re: preparing WG publication

On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:12:56 +0200, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>  
wrote:
> I can certainly see that the WHATWG version of the document should link  
> to the W3C version, since that is the official standard as issued by a  
> recognized standards body.  However, I see no reason for the reverse,  
> since anything that is in the WHATWG version will either be already in  
> the W3C version _OR_ it will be "future stuff".

The WHATWG version has several features through the use of JavaScript that  
the W3C version lacks. It also has a much better license. We're also  
supposed to work together with the WHATWG community. Having links both  
ways makes sense.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 19:24:59 UTC