W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: preparing WG publication

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:23:28 +0200
To: "'Edward O'Connor'" <hober0@gmail.com>, "Simpson, Grant Leyton" <glsimpso@indiana.edu>, "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vdzxhed064w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:12:56 +0200, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>  
> I can certainly see that the WHATWG version of the document should link  
> to the W3C version, since that is the official standard as issued by a  
> recognized standards body.  However, I see no reason for the reverse,  
> since anything that is in the WHATWG version will either be already in  
> the W3C version _OR_ it will be "future stuff".

The WHATWG version has several features through the use of JavaScript that  
the W3C version lacks. It also has a much better license. We're also  
supposed to work together with the WHATWG community. Having links both  
ways makes sense.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 19:24:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:20 UTC