- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:57:19 +0200
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Adam Barth, Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:18 -0700: > 2010/6/12 Leif Halvard Silli : >> Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC): >> […] >>> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the >>> only way to have a specification that actually makes >>> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making. >> […] >> >> Thanks for relaying to us that >> >> (1) you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and >> (2) that its existence isn't related to "a much better license". > > I don't think either of those conclusions follow from what Ian wrote. Regarding (1), then he underlined the opposite possibility as well: ]] -- I've no idea what we'll do if you make a decision on an issue of normative relevance, like many of the issues that you keep pushing back and not resolving. [[ -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 01:57:56 UTC