- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:04:23 +0200
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4C17A487.4070801@kosek.cz>
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > On 2010-06-15 13:05, Sam Ruby wrote: >> We have a change proposal to replace the reference to RFC 1345 to a >> reference to an ANSI or ISO spec that defines ASCII, such as >> [ANSI.X3-4.1986]: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0084.html >> >> At the present time, we have no counter proposals. Accordingly, the >> chairs are issuing a call for consensus at this time. If there are no >> objections, we will adopt this change proposal on June 22, 2010. > > ANSI.X3.4-1986 is apparently nowhere to be found. I even tried > searching the ANSI website and their Standards Store for it, and came up > with nothing at all. Referencing a specification which, for all intents > and purposes, is effectively non-existent and unavailable in any form > would not be useful. (It's probably printed and hidden in some archive > somewhere, but still out of reach of most people). And why not to reference ISO/IEC 646:1991? It is not freely available, but you can buy it at http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=4777 It is not unusual to reference ISO/IEC standards from W3C specs. In this case I don't think it is a harm that the spec is not freely available. It is not reasonable to expect someone will need to look inside it. It is there just for a correct reference. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 16:05:02 UTC