Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-31

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> This change proposal contains objections to the other two change proposals,
> and such will prove helpful at later stages in the resolution of this issue.
> 
> With respect to the objection to Steve's proposal, the following rationale for
> the current text: 'We need to try having such information as "in your face" as
> possible. Having additional documents would be additionally helpful, but does
> not preclude having detailed advice in the HTML spec itself.' does not justify
> the specific exact text present.
> 
> With respect to the objection to Laura's change proposal, this objection does
> not address each way in which Laura's change proposal differs from the current
> text.
> 
> In all, this change proposal needs to be updated in order to provide rationale
> for the current text before it can be considered.

Could you clarify exactly which "current text" it is that needs justifying?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 00:19:18 UTC