- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:18:49 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: > > This change proposal contains objections to the other two change proposals, > and such will prove helpful at later stages in the resolution of this issue. > > With respect to the objection to Steve's proposal, the following rationale for > the current text: 'We need to try having such information as "in your face" as > possible. Having additional documents would be additionally helpful, but does > not preclude having detailed advice in the HTML spec itself.' does not justify > the specific exact text present. > > With respect to the objection to Laura's change proposal, this objection does > not address each way in which Laura's change proposal differs from the current > text. > > In all, this change proposal needs to be updated in order to provide rationale > for the current text before it can be considered. Could you clarify exactly which "current text" it is that needs justifying? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 00:19:18 UTC