- From: Patrick Ion <ion@ams.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:21:32 -0400
- To: "Simpson, Grant Leyton" <glsimpso@indiana.edu>
- Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Simpson, Grant Leyton wrote: > > Persuasively argued. I'm won over. > >> 'Polyglot markup: HTML Compatible XML Documents' Very good. However, the suggestion for a change to 'XHTML documents' yields the question as to whether this deals _only_ with XTHML, or whether other XML vocabularies, such as SVG and MathML, may be involved. That seems to be the case from Section 5 http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html#namespaces and Subsection 6.2.2.2. >> >> By the way, what do you think about saying "XHTML" instead of "XML"? >> >> 'Polyglot markup: HTML Compatible XHTML Documents' > > This is better yet, since the document deals specifically with XHTML and not other applications of XML. My only addition would be a hyphen to make "HTML Compatible" into a compound adjective: > > "Polyglot Markup: HTML-compatible XHTML Documents" So I'm doubtful about 'not other applications of XML' and suggest retaining 'XML Documents', even if not all such documents are discussed. A start is being made. Patrick Ion ion@ams.org
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 18:22:27 UTC