- From: Simpson, Grant Leyton <glsimpso@indiana.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:31:29 -0400
- To: Patrick Ion <ion@ams.org>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Patrick Ion wrote: > > However, the suggestion for a change to 'XHTML documents' yields > the question as to whether this deals _only_ with XTHML, or whether > other XML vocabularies, such as SVG and MathML, may be involved. > That seems to be the case from Section 5 > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html#namespaces > > and Subsection 6.2.2.2. > Fair enough, but the abstract says: "This document summarizes design guidelines for authors who wish their XHTML or HTML documents to validate on either HTML or XML parsers..." http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html#abstract Given the focus on XHTML or HTML documents, I understood the SVG and MathML namespace references to deal with SVG or MathML elements within XHTML/HTML documents. I may be wrong on this. Either way, it might be valuable to clarify this point (is it about XHTML or multiple XML applications) in the document. Grant
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 18:32:07 UTC