Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:46:12 +0200
• To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
• CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4C10B464.3040703@gmx.de>

On 10.06.2010 11:04, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Le 10/06/10 10:57, Julian Reschke a écrit :
>
>> For the record: I think there's a limited audience for this spec, and
>> that that audience already is familiar with "polyglot". -1 to changing
>> that.
>
> Limited audience is really a bad excuse for a title that's difficult to
> understand. Furthermore, it's only an editor's draft at this time,
> right?

I don't think the title is difficult to understand.

What I said is that I think that the audience actually *does* understand 
it, and is familiar with the term.

And what has the current status of the document have to do with that?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 09:46:57 UTC