- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:32:14 -0500
- To: Matthew Ratzloff <matt@builtfromsource.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Matthew, I wrote: >> If the >> goal is true convergence, we need to eliminate all differences and >> have one spec. >> >> I guess a fundamental question is: can decisions made via the decision >> policy apply not only for the HTMLWG but also for WHATWG? Ian, do you >> foresee that as a possibility? If that can happen we have a solution. >> Two specs are not needed. Matthew wrote: > The two groups have different charters and different decision making > processes. Why is that necessary? > The working groups should come together to define what > "convergence" realistically means and work from there. To me convergence is the act of converging. It is coming together. It is uniting. It is moving toward uniformity; especially with the goal of producing one single authoritative HTML5. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Sunday, 20 June 2010 18:32:42 UTC