- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:15:44 +0200
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 2010-06-15 18:14, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On 15.06.2010 17:36, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >>> ANSI.X3.4-1986 is apparently nowhere to be found. I even tried >>> searching the ANSI website and their Standards Store for it, and >>> came up with nothing at all. Referencing a specification which, >>> for all intents and purposes, is effectively non-existent and >>> unavailable in any form would not be useful. (It's probably >>> printed and hidden in some archive somewhere, but still out of >>> reach of most people). > > Lachlan - are you objecting to the call for consensus? I'm objecting to referencing a document that doesn't seem to exist any more. > Does your objection stand if we interpret the Change Proposal to allow other > alternatives that are publicly available online, such as > ECMA-006?<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-006.pdf> I have no objection to referencing any other available resource, nor to leaving the existing RFC 1345 reference unchanged. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 17:16:15 UTC