- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 04:16:37 +0200
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
Shelley Powers, Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:41:39 -0500: > Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> Shelley Powers, Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:03:45 -0500: > My change proposals included this information so that people could > follow what happened: originally I believed the elements needed > tighter definition, but after research and additional thought, I > believed they needed to be removed. I understand the motivation, but I think you should have removed the history part from your proposal. > I could not respond on the survey questions because I was not a > member of the group, and had lost edit and response privileges. I > couldn't even correct any errors in the change proposals, including > some formatting errors, which may have led to more confusion. It may have. > However, I did hope that people would read through the entire > proposal before responding in the survey. I read the correct version of your change proposal now, and didn't spot important things that I had missed. Regardless: To first have offered one variant where you suggested to tighten <figure> for then to offer another variant where you suggested to remove <figure>, may easily be interpreted as if your objection to <figure> were not unsurmountable. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 02:17:11 UTC