- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:02:55 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 24.06.2010 08:51, Ian Hickson wrote: > ... > Done, more or less. (I had to change the example a bit to have conforming > alternative text that was actually accessible, rather than the text in the > suggested example which was really a caption; I made some changes to the > spacing; and I changed the example's prose a little to be actually > plausible as a real Web page. It would be helpful if the chairs could > check the quality of proposed changes themselves so that I don't have to > make these kinds of changes when the decisions are made, since having to > do them myself means I run the risk each time of making a change that is > then not in what the chairs consider the spirit of the decision, and then > we have to do it all over again.) > ... Well. Proposal (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1107.html>): <p>For an enhanced experience, we recommend that you install the <a href="/get-plugin">O3D plugin</a>. Actual text (<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-iframe-element.html#the-object-element>): <p>To see the teapot actually rendered by O3D on your computer, please download and install the <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/o3d/docs/gettingstarted.html#install">O3D plugin</a>.</p> It's pretty clear that you wanted to avoid having "plugin" and "enhanced" in the same sentence. It's also not entirely clear what was wrong with the given link. At this time, I'd propose that you simply execute the WG decision, and open a bug if there's something you're unhappy with. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 07:03:35 UTC