- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:21:31 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jacobs B. Ian" <ij@w3.org>
not sure it should be on public-html reply-to www-archive@w3.org Le 17 juin 2010 à 07:16, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : > CSS 2.1 is a good example. We've had plenty of confusion there too with the TR/ version being hopelessly behind (and still is; lots of changes have been made since September 2009). I guess this discussion is around the * compromise between Stability vs Implementability * and maybe also markup, technologies users. There are people with different needs with regards to specifications and the W3C has to find a way which will make it possible to cater the different type of communities. Usually, * implementers need a document which evolves quickly depending on the feedback * web developers/designers need a document which is stable. Maybe the W3C could "rebrand" the thing (using tools) with a developer edition and a public edition? I will ping Ian Jacobs about it. It fits into the discussions going on these days. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 23:22:04 UTC