- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:44:08 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli, Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:40:05 +0200: > Laura Carlson, Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:14:05 -0500: >> Hi Leif … snip … >> In light of this and Jame's bug " Clarify that a figure can be any >> content with a caption" [1], how about renaming <figure> something >> like <content> or <embeddedcontent>. It would match the definition >> better. It would also disambiguate and avoid the conception from the >> print world (held many) that figure should be restricted to image of >> some sort. > … >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html4-differences/Overview.html#new-elements >> [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9876 > > I must think about this. But I think that if we were to use the > Differences document as basis, then <figure> it is not needed. ;-) Sorry. Out of time. I meant that if we were to base it on the Differences doc, then such a change was not needed. -- lh
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 16:44:42 UTC