- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:32:09 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 06/01/2010 08:03 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: >> Something for people to keep in mind, now -- the chairs don't judge >> based on the proposals or counter-proposals, only the objections raised >> in the surveys for both. I don't believe this was clearly stated in the >> decision process. > > As previously stated, the chairs are attempting to follow the W3C > process[1], and therefore after all attempts at amicable resolution fail, > seek to favor proposals that create the weakest objections. To be completely specific, are these "weakest objections" you speak of *only* the objections given during the survey, or are the various proposals counted as objections against each other (when appropriate)? I specifically avoided commenting on the polls with an objection to the Change Proposals, as I felt that my objections were adequately stated in the counter proposals that I helped author. If the "objections" are only those that appear in the survey, I will in the future avoid putting any effort into counter proposals, and save that effort for objecting when the poll comes around instead. This would be a bad use of process (it would be just moving the counter-proposal phase into the poll objections phase), but I'm interested in maximizing the effect of the effort I spend here. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 01:33:01 UTC