- From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:02:55 -0700
- To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
I think that any references to the WHATWG "version" of the document should be removed from W3C communications and documents. It's confusing and misleading. Leonard -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 9:24 AM To: Anne van Kesteren Cc: public-html@w3.org Subject: preparing WD publication On 08.06.2010 15:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... > It does not talk about the specification. It talks about the > specification draft _text_ and specifically says "amongst others". Seems > perfectly clear to me. "The latest stable version of the editor's draft of this specification is always available on the W3C CVS server and in the WHATWG Subversion repository." This implies that the WHATWG repository contains the latest draft of the W3C HTML5 spec. This is not true; it contains stuff that the WG has decided should not be part of the spec. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 16:15:51 UTC