- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:38:59 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On 06/07/2010 12:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Leif Halvard Silli > <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: >> The need to continue to discus<figure>,<details> etc was not >> expressed in the counter-proposal. If it had been expressed there, then >> not only would it have lowered the ad-hominen smack of the whole >> counter-proposal effort, it could also have lead to more support for it. > > I wasn't aware that there was any particular need to assert that this > portion of the spec would continue to be edited like every other > portion of the spec. It seems redundant to add that into every Change > Proposal written from now on, but I can make sure that it is a part of > any proposals I author from now on if necessary. Not necessary. > ~TJ - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 16:39:31 UTC