- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:20:40 -0400
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 06/02/2010 12:44 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > This call passes. Anne: please update the html4-differences. The issue[1] holding up publication has been resolved. Current schedule is for publication on Thursday, June 24. Should that not be possible, the next opportunity is Monday, June 28th. > - Sam Ruby [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0215.html > On 05/18/2010 02:39 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new revisions of the >> following documents in accordance with the Working Group Heartbeat >> requirements: >> >> HTML 5: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/ >> HTML+RDFa: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ >> HTML Microdata: http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/ >> HTML Canvas 2D Context: http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/ >> HTML: The Markup Language: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/ >> >> and to publish as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) the following >> documents: >> >> HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guidelines: >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html >> >> >> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives: >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ >> >> Additionally, and as we have done with previous republications of the >> HTML5 draft, the chairs would like to ask Anne to update the HTML5 diffs >> from HTML4 to reflect the latest changes. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/html4-differences/ >> >> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive >> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday, >> May 26th, this resolution will carry. >> >> Considerations to note: >> >> - As a First Public Working Draft, this publication will trigger patent >> policy review. >> - As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be >> complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on >> the contents. >> - Objections may be made on specific documents but not on others. >> Counting the differences document, there are effectively eight different >> documents under consideration at this time. >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 18:21:08 UTC