- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/22/2010 04:06 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > > I understand that Ian fixed a bug. What I don't understand (and the > > > context here is the topic of convergence) is why Ian agreed to fix that > > > bug, but only in the W3C copy of the spec. > > > > I made the change only in the W3C version because I believe it's a bad > > change, but did not believe it was bad enough to argue against. > > > > > Either there is a problem with it or there is not. To fix it in just > > > one spec is, in itself, an indication that convergence is felt to be > > > an important criteria. > > > > Fair enough. Since I feel, as you do, that convergence is an important > > criteria, I've done as you suggest and reverted the change from the > > W3C copy. > > Note: while I suggested convergence, I neither suggested reversion from > the W3C draft or incorporation into the WHATWG draft. If that isn't exactly what you were suggesting above when suggesting that just one spec should be changed, then I really have no idea what it is you were suggesting. If you could be clearer in these requests that would be most helpful. > In any case, please attend to the resolution of bug 9241 as the previous > resolution no longer matches the editor's decision. I am now at a loss as to what you want me to do. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 00:26:39 UTC