- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > > Such an approach should satisfy all stated objections. Hi Sam, Thanks for the 3 notes covering Issues 66, 90, and 91. Will there be forthcoming resolutions based upon these decisions? While an 'answer' seems apparent in all three responses, I do not see any actionable item(s). Some clarification would be appreciated: for example in the case of Issue-66, are we to assume that this is also a formal (informal?) request to the UAAG WG to ensure that the requirement is met within UAAG2? Thanks in advance JF
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:37:34 UTC