W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:56:57 -0700
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E0280CEB-833A-43D1-A691-9B732AEA26C2@gbiv.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Jun 8, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> The explanation you did provide is clearly political:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0001.html
> You explicitly say that there's no evidence that the text is good, and 
> then assert without evidence that the text is bad. I can't really imagine 
> a more political double-speak argument. I'm frankly embarassed to even be 
> involved in these kinds of shenanigans.

What utter nonsense.  Sam provided a link to the evidence that the text
is bad.  There was no reason for him to repeat the same arguments again.
The only embarrassment here is your childish disregard of every decision
made by this group.  What is the point of having a consensus-driven standard
if every decision that the dictator doesn't like is casually disregarded 
and supplanted by a private copy of the same spec?

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 02:57:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:03 UTC