- From: Chris Double <cdouble@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:22:01 +1200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there anybody apart from Ian who does not understand what the change > proposal [1] is asking for? I think it would be great if more than a one liner was proposed in 'Details'. You posted an example of Canvas usage earlier where you felt adding 'usemap' would improve things. Describing this original canvas usage, followed by how 'usemap' would improve things would provide more details about what is actually wanted. Including details on what parts of the specification that currently use 'usemap' should be pulled into canvas or otherwise modified would be useful. Canvas is used in a more dynamic manner than img. Drawing into it is done via javascript. How do you handle things like the drawing of the canvas is not complete but the 'usemap' is active, etc. Perhaps issues about that could be discussed. BTW, unrelated and a bit 'nitty', there are a few spelling mistakes in the change proposal. 'descitpion', 'assitive' (I think, perhaps I'm not familiar with the term), 'intercatrive'. -- http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz
Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 07:22:34 UTC