W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Request for editing guidance

From: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:56:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4C0F9DA0.7000005@namics.com>
To: public-html@w3.org
CC: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 09.06.2010 13:34, Charles McCathieNevile wrote in reply to Ian Hickson:
> I suggest:
> "Where the working group disagrees with the editor, implement the working
> group's decisions. Do not attempt to undercut those decisions by further
> editorial shenanigans".

Is it just me who feels offended by Ian's lack of respect towards the 
W3C, the HTML WG, and the process of consensus? I find this behavior 
unprofessional and intolerable:

"Eh, I just find it amusing... HTML5 still lives happily at 
whatwg.org/html unaffected by the politics! :-)" [1,2]

How long will the W3C tolerate a parallel, conflicting version of the 
spec where the editor is ignoring and publicly mocking the W3C working 
group's decisions?


[1] http://twitter.com/Hixie/status/9004127198
[2] Snapshot: http://flic.kr/p/88Y3UB
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 13:57:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:03 UTC