- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:45:55 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
The co-chairs will decide as they will, but I find the written decisions to be weak--though not surprising, as I don't believe any of my change proposals will meet with success. The written decisions boil down to: the browser companies want them, they'll implement them, and therefore the issue is moot. Neither of the decisions addresses the other HTML audiences, such as web developers, designers, tech writers, tool builders, and so on. That Henri says, "I object to making the WG fail to deliver to Web authors by removing the element, because I think this author needs deserves to be addressed" is somehow taken as an ultimate truth is, well, ludicrous. That a statement that is so broad as to be virtually meaningless is given such strength as an objection is astonishing. It shows that the decisions were made even before the survey, and the co-chairs picked among the arguments, as justification. Shelley
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:46:35 UTC