Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
> To have the W3C specification refer readers to another specification for 
> an exact list of differences, and to have that other specification 
> indicate that the omission was due to political reasons is intolerable.

FYI: Based on some sage advice from Aryeh and others on #whatwg, I've 
changed the wording in the WHATWG version so that instead of explicitly 
saying the decision was political, it just links to the decision and lets 
people see for themselves.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 20:01:29 UTC