- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:01:00 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: > > To have the W3C specification refer readers to another specification for > an exact list of differences, and to have that other specification > indicate that the omission was due to political reasons is intolerable. FYI: Based on some sage advice from Aryeh and others on #whatwg, I've changed the wording in the WHATWG version so that instead of explicitly saying the decision was political, it just links to the decision and lets people see for themselves. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 20:01:29 UTC