- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:55:59 +0100
- To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "HTML Accessibility Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:05:25 +0100, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bruce, > >>> I couldn't accept that; it's throwing the baby out with the bath water. >>> I'd rather some ambiguity between aside and figure in edge cases than >>> the >>> inability to have a video or a data table as an illustrative figure. > > Hmmm. You said, "a video or a data table". In the singular. Is that > the key, Bruce? What do you think of restricting figure to a single > element as content to help simplify? No - I think the example of one figure, multiple images in http://html5doctor.com/the-figure-figcaption-elements/ is legitimate -- Hang loose and stay groovy, Bruce Lawson Web Evangelist www.opera.com (work) www.brucelawson.co.uk (personal) www.twitter.com/brucel Pre-order my HTML5 book www.introducinghtml5.com
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 19:57:04 UTC