- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:00:32 -0500
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi John, >> The decisions documents did a good job of detailing rationale for most >> of the survey comments. However, it might help if more discussion on >> specific points raised in change proposals/counter proposals >> themselves had been provided. > > Isn't that the point of this mailing list? To have discussions? Yes. Of course. The point of the chairs decision documents are to provide a decision. They did that. But the chairs didn't address or discuss points Shelley raised in her change proposals. If the chairs could do that, it might avoid a formal objection. I don't know. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 20:01:06 UTC