- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:42:18 +0100
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinrNxADmcxOJAeaV1JBwGavzqW2urDKC0w__Mvd@mail.gmail.com>
Is there anybody apart from Ian who does not understand what the change proposal [1] is asking for? [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/addimagemaptocanvas regards Stevef On 24 June 2010 23:14, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > It should also be noted that the change proposal does not give enough > > > detail for the spec to be edited to address the proposal. Merely > > > making the "usemap" attribute legal on <canvas> doesn't do anything to > > > make usemap="" actually work on <canvas>. > > > > If this were true, it would invalidate the original Change Proposal, if > > I understand correctly. However, I looked at the spec for usemap and > > didn't see anything that looked ambiguous. What's an example sentence > > in the spec that you don't think can be changed unambiguously based on > > just "Add the usemap attribute to the canvas element"? You'd have to > > update the image map processing model too, but I don't see anything > > where it would be unclear how to change it to get it to work as > > expected. > > My point was just that the actual changes are far greater in scope than > the text in the change proposal might suggest, which I think is a bit > misleading. Following the change proposal to the letter wouldn't leave the > spec in a consistent or useful state; normally, the chairs insist on > excessive detail (for example, see what Sam has been asking of Henri with > respect to the ASCII reference!). It seems very inconsistent of the > chairs, and in this case Sam in particular, to allow a single sentence > here despite this needed changes to multiple sections, including normative > changes to a processing model, multiple indexes, and the IDL requirements, > when a trivial issue such as what reference one should have for ASCII, of > all things, requires detailed and explicit text. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 06:43:11 UTC