- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:23:20 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "HTML Accessibility Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:12:42 +0100, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Another option would be to restrict figure to just images and forget >>> it as a grouping mechanism. >> >> That's unacceptable. > Maybe. Maybe not. I'm open to ways of clearing up the confusion and > ambiguity. That would be one way. I couldn't accept that; it's throwing the baby out with the bath water. I'd rather some ambiguity between aside and figure in edge cases than the inability to have a video or a data table as an illustrative figure. (As always, I'm speaking personally, not for my employer) -- Hang loose and stay groovy, Bruce Lawson Web Evangelist www.opera.com (work) www.brucelawson.co.uk (personal) www.twitter.com/brucel Pre-order my HTML5 book www.introducinghtml5.com
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 17:24:21 UTC