- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:55:30 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTim7wqkebudCbzctsk5Q4SpITbeGi4c4DGDH68fn@mail.gmail.com>
>But there are plenty of legitimate tables around without headers. E.g. magic squares: So how many of the instances of tables without headers are legit 0.1%, 1%, 10% if the answer to this is at the lower end of the scale then it would be reasonable to conclude that if a table without headers is checked by a conformance checker , the use of the table is non conforming and should be flagged as such , probably with a warning. regards stevef On 17 June 2010 10:39, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:25:02 +0200, Steven Faulkner < > faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is there some kind of multiple-sentence-header abuse you are trying to >>> combat? Why should we not allow it? >>> >> >> Not particularly I am trying to understand in general what makes some >> things >> a conformance error in HTMl5 and others not. >> though in regards to tables, if there ARE no legit use cases for data >> tables without headers it would be a simple way to flag a conofmance >> error for abuse of tables right? >> > > But there are plenty of legitimate tables around without headers. E.g. > magic squares: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_square > > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 09:56:23 UTC