- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:57:04 -0400
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On 06/10/2010 05:49 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> [...] >> >> So basically you are admitting that the chairs' WG decisions are in fact >> based purely on volume of complaints on a case-by-case basis and not on >> any consistent technical grounds. > > I'm not sure you can logically conclude "purely", however IIRC the > chairs have multiple times noted the criteria of "raises the least > objections" as one of the considerations when there are multiple > options being considered. (I don't have a citation - just off the top > of my head from memory from this list - chairs please feel encouraged > to correct me if you feel that statement is inaccurate). Citation: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#managing-dissent - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:57:40 UTC