Sunday, 30 November 2008
Friday, 28 November 2008
Saturday, 29 November 2008
- Re: standard bug / suggestion: scroll bar placement in frames
- Re: standard bug / suggestion: scroll bar placement in frames
- [css3-values] cap-height unit?
- Re: Effect of 'position:relative' on 'table-*' display values
- Re: [CSS2.1] table container behavior (captions, floats and margin collapsing)
Friday, 28 November 2008
- Re: [CSS3Units] angles should not be normalised
- Re: standard bug / suggestion: scroll bar placement in frames
- Re: Effect of 'position:relative' on 'table-*' display values
- Re: [CSS3Units] angles should not be normalised
Thursday, 27 November 2008
- [CSS3Units] angles should not be normalised
- Re: Effect of 'position:relative' on 'table-*' display values
- Re: Effect of 'position:relative' on 'table-*' display values
- Re: [CSS21] minor issue: location of comment tokens
- Re: Effect of 'position:relative' on 'table-*' display values
- Re: [CSS21] minor issue: location of comment tokens
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2008-11-26
- Effect of 'position:relative' on 'table-*' display values
- Re: [CSS21] minor issue: location of comment tokens
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: standard bug / suggestion: scroll bar placement in frames
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- [CSSWG] Your opinion needed : Position of list-item markers
- Re: [CSS2.1] Position of list-item markers
- RE: [CSS2.1] table container behavior (captions, floats and margin collapsing)
- Re: [CSS2.1] Position of list-item markers
- RE: [CSS2.1] table container behavior (captions, floats and margin collapsing)
- Re: [CSS2.1] table container behavior (captions, floats and margin collapsing)
- Re: [CSS2.1] Position of list-item markers
- Re: [css3-layout] "Label" Text for tabs.
- Re: Allow whitespace before the commas?
- Re: [css3-layout] "Label" Text for tabs.
- [css3-layout][css3-grid] Meshing Template Layout with Grid Layout
- Re: [css3-layout] "Label" Text for tabs.
- Re: [css3-layout] "Label" Text for tabs.
- [CSS 2.1] issue 24: parsing invalid syntax and matching brackets
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
Monday, 24 November 2008
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
Friday, 14 November 2008
Thursday, 13 November 2008
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
- RE: [CSS Marquee] i18n comment 1: RTL without direction
- Re: [CSS Marquee] i18n comment 1: RTL without direction
- Re: [CSS21] minor issue: location of comment tokens
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [CSS21] minor issue: location of comment tokens
- [CSS21] minor issue: location of comment tokens
Monday, 24 November 2008
- updates to CSS Transforms, Transitions and Animations proposals
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [css3-mediaqueries] feedback on device-aspect-ratio, aspect-ratio and orientation
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [css3-mediaqueries] feedback on device-aspect-ratio, aspect-ratio and orientation
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: standard bug / suggestion: scroll bar placement in frames
- Re: [css3-mediaqueries] feedback on device-aspect-ratio, aspect-ratio and orientation
Saturday, 22 November 2008
Monday, 24 November 2008
- Re: [CSS2.1] table container behavior (captions, floats and margin collapsing)
- [CSS2.1] table container behavior (captions, floats and margin collapsing)
Sunday, 23 November 2008
Friday, 21 November 2008
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- Re: [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
- [css3] "keep aspect ratio" feature
Thursday, 20 November 2008
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
- [CSS21] Missing "the" in section 9.5
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2008-11-12
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2008-11-04
- [CSS3 Backgrounds] Remove option to ignore hidden backgrounds.
- Re: [css3-layout] CSS Advanced Layout Module on Reddit
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Selectors API: New Last Call
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: [CSS3 Backgrounds] Simple property that reduces amount of images needed.
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: [CSS3 Backgrounds] Simple property that reduces amount of images needed.
- [CSS3 Backgrounds] Simple property that reduces amount of images needed.
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
Monday, 17 November 2008
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [whatwg] Sections, headers, and styling
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-box] box-sizing on width and height
Sunday, 16 November 2008
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- [css3-selectors] Elements that can have :focus pseudo-class
- Re: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- Re: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Saturday, 15 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Images, Tables, and Mysterious Gaps
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: [css3-background] Delimiter character in the new background color fallback syntax
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- [css3-background] Delimiter character in the new background color fallback syntax
Friday, 14 November 2008
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Thursday, 13 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: svg fonts as web font format?
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: svg fonts as web font format?
- RE: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: background-position-x & y
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: svg fonts as web font format?
- svg fonts as web font format?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- RE: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- RE: background-position-x & y
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- IP in fonts
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- [CSS2.1] Position of list-item markers
- [css2.1 issue 79] proposed text
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: background-position-x & y
- Backgrounds and Borders - updating 'background-position' example
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
Monday, 10 November 2008
Monday, 3 November 2008
Saturday, 1 November 2008
Wednesday, 29 October 2008
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: [CSSWG] Summary and Resolutions F2F: Printing, Columns, and Pagination
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Towards a new CSS Validator?
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Towards a new CSS Validator?
Monday, 10 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: [css2.1 issue 79] editorial change for min-height in margin collapsing
Monday, 10 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- FW: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- [CSSWG] Summary and Resolutions F2F: CSS2.1 and Margin Collapsing
- [CSSWG] Summary and Resolutions F2F: Printing, Columns, and Pagination
- [CSSWG] Summary and Resolutions F2F: css3-color, css3-background, border-parts, constants/variables
- [CSSWG] Summary and Resolutions F2F: Logistics, Charter and New Modules (Apple's proposals, GCPM, vertical text)
- [CSSWG] Summary and Resolutions F2F: Selectors and calc()
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal
Sunday, 9 November 2008
Saturday, 8 November 2008
Friday, 7 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- [css2.1 issue 79] editorial change for min-height in margin collapsing
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- RE: [CSS21] Spaces, non-breaking spaces, ideographic spaces and the word-spacing property
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
Thursday, 6 November 2008
- Re: [CSS21] Spaces, non-breaking spaces, ideographic spaces and the word-spacing property
- Re: [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- [css3-fonts] duplication and @font-face rules
- RE: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] Ambiguities relating to UNICODE-RANGE tokens
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: Selectors Tests
- RE: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] Ambiguities relating to UNICODE-RANGE tokens
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
Thursday, 6 November 2008
- RE: Selectors Tests
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- RE: [CSS21] Spaces, non-breaking spaces, ideographic spaces and the word-spacing property
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- Re: Selectors Tests
- RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: Selectors Tests
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- RE: [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- RE: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- Re: [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- [CSS2.1] Clarification on section 4.1.3 and the application of escaped newlines to identifiers.
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts
- RE: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
- [CSSWG] Minutes F2F 2008-10-21
- [CSSWG] Minutes F2F 2008-10-20
- [CSSWG] Minutes F2F 2008-10-19
- RE: [gcpm] border-parts
- Re: [gcpm] border-parts
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
Monday, 3 November 2008
- RE: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
- RE: [css3-page] Page area changes within a document
- Re: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification should link to CSS2.1 CR
- Re: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification should link to CSS2.1 CR
- Re: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification should link to CSS2.1 CR
- Re: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification should link to CSS2.1 CR
- Re: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification should link to CSS2.1 CR
- Re: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
Sunday, 2 November 2008
- RE: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
- Re: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
- Re: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
- Re: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
- Re: [css3-mediaqueries] feedback on device-aspect-ratio, aspect-ratio and orientation
- Re: [webfonts] pixel-perfection
- Re: [webfonts] pixel-perfection