- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:51:38 -0500
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >> At the moment, in a vanilla Gecko, <input>, <button>, <select>, >> <option>, <optgroup>, <textarea>. > > So these are elements that know about @disabled. Why not to use > [disabled] as a selector then? Because that would match <div disabled>. Also, HTML5 is introducing changes to how this stuff works so that all controls in a <fieldset disabled> would match :disabled (but not [disabled]). > <option> (passive element) and e.g. <input> (active element) are so > different In both cases :enabled basically means "can be submitted to the server" at the moment. > Stays: "This [disabled] attribute is inherited but local declarations > override the inherited value." I have no idea what that could mean, and neither does anyone else as far as I can tell. > XTF... what about XBL then? Those <input>s in shadow trees... how they > interact with :disabled/:enabled thing? They match it depending on their state. -Boris
Received on Saturday, 8 November 2008 15:55:54 UTC