- From: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:23:08 -0800
- To: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Nov 10, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Dave Singer wrote: >> >> So, only files served using a scheme that requires network access >> would require this? What about other forms of encryption/ >> obfuscation? Would those be illegal? > > Specs only tell you what you are required to do; you can always do > other things if you want to. Sorry - "illegal" was a poor choice of words. I mean, say I have some other spec that uses CSS 3 to style XML documents. However, in that spec I require all fonts to be raw OTF encrypted using "Brady-13" hyper-strong encryption. Would those documents no longer be valid CSS 3 documents, since they are not using the CSS approved encryption/ obfuscation mechanism? --Brady
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 19:23:46 UTC