- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:07:23 +0100
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0811030007t4ce754f0iea1429375a1ecbc0@mail.gmail.com>
Chris, My concern is more or less that "to be released" CSS 2.1 implementations, would have trouble to keep in sync with SVG Tiny 1.2 implementations since SVG is relying on CSS 2 (which has substantial difference with 2.1). Probably a good thing is to identify dependency on "CSS 2 only" behavior and to provide a evolution plan to CSS 2.1 and CSS 3 features for future release of SVG specs Regards, Mohamed On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > Hello www-svg, > > Mohamed ZERGAOUI wrote: > > > Instead of linking to CSS2 REC, you should link to CSS2.1 CR (which > > hopefully by the time will become a REC) > > The SVG WG shares your hope that CSS 2.1 will soon become a Rec. > However, given the current degree of spec coverage in the CSS 2.1 test > suite, it is unlikely to do so in less than a year. In addition, parts > of SVG refer to functionality which is in CSS 2 but was removed from > CSS 2.1. > > For SVG Tiny 1.2, therefore, we will continue to point to CSS2. We > look forward to being able to normatively reference CSS2.1 in future > specifications. > > The SVG WG hopes that this answer responds to your concern. Please let > us know whether it does or not. > > -- > Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org > Technical Director, Interaction Domain > W3C Graphics Activity Lead > Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 08:30:19 UTC