- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:21:01 -0500
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > Perhaps the spec should forget about using ":enabled". The current spec says > "The :enabled pseudo-class represents user interface > elements that are in an enabled state; such elements > have a corresponding disabled state." > > I consider the words "user interace" as the most important part of that > definition. As such, I'd specify ":interactive" as any content that > behaves like some kind of interactive element (e.g. control interface) > regardless of its current state (disabled or not). There is a subtle definitional difference here. For example <a href="..."> would match your definition of :interactive but does NOT match the current definition of :enabled (on purpose). -Boris
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 13:21:55 UTC