- From: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:08:31 -0800
- To: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Dave Singer wrote: > > If a user-agent is requested to use an embedded font that is not > labelled as freely usable, and that font is not 'obfuscated', the UA > MUST refuse to use the font. Does this imply that a local font could not be used for a local CSS document if it is not marked as allowed for embedding? Or is this somehow tied to the transport mechanism? So, only files served using a scheme that requires network access would require this? What about other forms of encryption/obfuscation? Would those be illegal? --Brady
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 19:09:11 UTC