- From: James Hopkins <james@idreamincode.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:54:13 +0000
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Indeed they aren't. I would however propose that a feature similar to this would still generate an underlying error (invalid) message, but would also reveal to the user that "that particular property is invalid because it is specific to, and can only be read by [browser- name]", or something along those lines. On 13 Nov 2008, at 01:49, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > "It would be useful if the validator could determine which vendor- > specific prefix related to which browser and display the result (i.e > 'We have detected that you are using a property that is specific to, > and can only be read by [browser-name]" > > Vendor-prefixed properties are not valid, afaik. > > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 01:54:55 UTC