Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

With respect, "Philip TAYLOR <>"
didn't write any of the text cited at all ...  Of course,
I'm not accusing anyone of plagiarism, you understand :-)))

Dave Crossland wrote:
> 2008/11/13 Tab Atkins Jr. <>:
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Philip TAYLOR <> wrote:
>>> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>> No, I mean it quite literally.  Our level of happiness would be strictly
>>>> increased by allowing only free font linking, because right now we have *no*
>>>> font linking.  We would be happy with this.  We would by *happier* with
>>>> commercial fonts as well, but *any* font-linking is an improvement that
>>>> would make our lives better.
>> I would certainly be *more* happy if commercial
>> fonts were available as well and reasonably easy to use.  But some fonts are
>> better than no fonts,

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 18:27:08 UTC