- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:12:35 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: Patrick Garies <pgaries@fastmail.us>, www-style@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Patrick Garies wrote: >> The following wording seems to do all of the above: >> >> “The |:enabled| pseudo‐class represents user interface elements that >> are in an enabled state; such elements have a corresponding disabled >> state. >> >> Analogously, the |:disabled| pseudo‐class represents user interface >> elements that are in a disabled state; such elements have a >> corresponding enabled state. >> >> What constitutes an enabled state, a disabled state, and applicable >> user interface elements is language‐dependent. >> >> Note that CSS properties that might affect a user’s ability to >> interact with a given user interface element do not affect whether it >> matches |:enabled| or |:disabled|; e.g., the |display| and >> |visibility| properties have no effect on the enabled/disabled state >> of an element.” > > For what it's worth, I like this proposal. Me, too. Spec updated: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors3/#UIstates I replaced "Analogously" with "Conversely", and I also left in the statement "Most elements will be neither enabled nor disabled." ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 21:13:25 UTC