RE: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

As you indicated earlier, there have been technical solutions that you
have implemented in the past, which are covered by essential patent
claims. Can you please provide me with the link to a submission that did
provide additional details? As a new member, I am not aware of any
additional documentation that would be required to accompany a
submission. If you can help me find one, or point me to the appropriate
W3C rules and procedures, it would make it easier for me to bring this
up to the attention of my legal counsel.
Thank you,


	From: [] On
Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan
	Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:20 PM
	To: Levantovsky, Vladimir
	Cc:; David Woolley;
	Subject: Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise
	On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir
<> wrote:

	That does not contain details of the patent license. It merely
says that a license will be offered compatible with the W3C RF Licensing
Requirements. As we have already discussed, such a license may or may
not be GPL-compatible.
	"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our
iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by
his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of
us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity
of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:36:12 UTC